Dispositivo Alteracion Mental
by Malditos Cyborgs.org
__________________________________________________________________________
The
Bill Of Rights
an
excerpt from:
The Politics Of Consciousness by Steve Kubby
lf ye
love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude
better than the animated contest of freedom, go home from
us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch
down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains
set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were
our countrymen. --Samuel Adams
American
history, as it was taught to us, is a watered down, sanitized,
fictional account, created by government-run schools. American
history is not a bunch of old men, sitting around and having
intellectual discussions. It's about young, long haired,
radical patriots smuggling contraband, staging raids against
their oppressors, bravely fighting for their liberty, and
proclaiming across the land, "Don't Tread on Me."
The founders of this country were not the sort of nerds
and geeks you find today in the Republican and Democratic
parties. They were more like the courageous heroes you'll
find in Greenpeace. Our Founding Fathers were men of ideals,
who were not afraid to fight to win their freedom. Like
the brave Rainbow Warriors of Greenpeace, they did not hesitate
to risk their necks to dramatize an important issue.
The
Boston Tea Party is a great example of how our forefathers
stood up to tyranny with tactics like those of Greenpeace.
If the
Founding Fathers were alive today, they would never stand
for the War on Drugs. Thomas Jefferson would immediately
convene a war crimes commission to investigate and punish
those responsible for the jailing of more than 600,000 Americans.
Ben Franklin would be building homemade Patriot missiles.
George Washington and his men would be using those Patriot
missiles to blow DEA choppers out of the sky. Sam Adams
would be preaching revolution on college campuses. Ethan
Allen would be burning U.S. Customs boats. Thomas Paine
would be writing books like this, and Paul Revere would
ride up and down the Northern California coast, warning
marijuana growers that, 'The Feds are coming, the Feds are
coming!"
An exaggeration?
Not at all; the men who founded this country believed that
marijuana, which they called hemp, was critical to America.
In Colonial America it was a crime NOT to grow hemp. Jamestown
Colony, Virginia, ordered all farmers to grow hemp and later
jailed those who didn't comply. Hemp was valued for its
fiber, and its medicinal properties. Hemp allowed America
to have its own colonial press, without having to beg for
paper from England.
Our
great revolutionary documents such as Common Sense, The
Federalist Papers, The Declaration of Independence, and
The Constitution were all printed on paper made from hemp.
Science fiction writer and Ph.D. Robert Anton Wilson has
suggested that because George Washington smoked pot, he
was able to formulate non-linear military strategies that
often surprised and bewildered the British Redcoats. Our
American flag and even blue jeans were originally made from
hemp. Marijuana, it turns out, is as American as apple pie.
Nobody in your government-run school ever taught you these
historical facts, did they?
The
men and women who founded this great country fought many
a brave battle to secure our liberties. Once the war was
won, these patriots resolved to create a government that
would be "of the people and by the people." Our
government was established to be a servant of the people,
not the other way around. The signers of the Constitution
were deeply concerned about govemment getting out of control
and added ten amendments to the Constitution for the express
purpose of limiting the powers of the federal government.
Let's take a closer look at the incredible document these
men created to protect our rights from the abuses of government.
The
Preamble to the Bill of Rights states:
The
conventions of a number of the States having at the time
of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire,
in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers,
that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should
be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence
in the Government, will best insure the beneficient ends
of its institution.
That's
a clear message that government must not be allowed to grow
too large or powerful. The ten amendments that compose the
Bill of Rights were carefully worded to restrict the federal
government and keep it a servant of "We, the People."
Now let's examine each of the ten amendments and see how
our present government has betrayed us and our Bill of Rights.
Article
I tells the federal government to keep its hands off of
certain rights:
ARTICLE
I - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press: or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
Here,
in plain English, we see that the government is not to make
any law about religion, speech, press or assembly. But wait!
Our government has all sorts of laws and rules about religion,
speech, press and assembly. With regard to the sacramental
use of visionary plants and potions, the First Amendment
could not be any more explicit: "Congress shall make
no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof..." Needless to say, our
government holds that only religions that conform to its
standards are legal. For example, in 1990 the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled 6-3 that Oregon could deny unemployment benefits
to a drug counselor fired for eating peyote in a religious
ceremony. This is exactly what the First Amendment was meant
to prevent.
Article
II grants the right of the people to keep and bear arms:
ARTICLE
II - A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security
of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear
arms, shall not be infringed.
Article
II of the Bill of Rights grants the right of the people
to keep and bear arms. This amendment clearly says this
right "shall not be infringed." The 11-day siege
in Idaho by 400 armed agents against one family and the
massacre in Waco, Texas, of 24 children and 64 adults are
both examples of government-sponsored terrorism. In both
cases innocent people were killed in order to seize "unauthorized"
firearms, in direct violation of our Constitution.
Article
III prohibits the quartering of soldiers:
ARTICLE
III - No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in
any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time
of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Until
recently, under the Zero Tolerance laws, if the Feds wanted
to use your house, all they had to do was seize it. Now,
under new guidelines issued by the Supreme Court, the government
must first charge you with a crime. Then they can seize
your house, car, money and property. According to attorney
Richard Glen Boire:
In addition
to taking your cash and your car, the state and federal
governments can take your home and real property. Because
under the federal law cultivation of marijuana is a felony
punishable by more than one year in prison, the federal
governrnent can seize your home and real property if even
a single Cannabis plant is found on the property. In other
words, even if the marijuana was solely for your own personal
use and not for sale, it can form the basis for property
forfeiture under federal law.
Article
IV grants us the right to privacy and security against unreasonable
searches and seizures. Read this amendment carefully and
judge for yourself whether or not it is being obeyed by
our government:
ARTICLE
IV - The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirrnation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched, and
the persons or things to be seized.
Article
lV says that we are supposed to be secure and not have to
worry about searches and seizures, yet the government conducts
searches all the time on the slightest of evidence. Our
government seizes a billion dollars a year in homes, boats,
planes and money, without ever filing a charge. Even more
repugnant is the fact that the government often pays informants
25% of the seized assets to make allegations that are then
used to obtain search warrants. The Supreme Court finally
ruled in 1994 that someone's home could not be seized without
their being charged with a crime and having a trial, but
this ruling applies only to homes.
Article
V grants citizens important rights if they are accused of
a crime and specifically forbids the government from depriving
us of property without due process of law:
ARTICLE
V - No person shall be held to answers for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment
of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or
naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service
in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy
of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal
case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use without
just compensation.
This
amendment is crystal clear, and yet the government violates
it all the time. The IRS, DEA, and FDA are notorious for
seizing property without due process. These government agencies
seize first and ask questions later.
Once
they seize your property, it is your job to go to court
and try to plead your case. No due process here, you're
guilty until proven innocent.
Drug
testing, in criminal cases, clearly violates the Fifth Amendment,
and yet the Supreme Court has ruled that this amendment
applies only to testimony.
Article
VI guarantees the right to speedy and public tnals:
ARTICLE
VI - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy
the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial
jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have
been committed, which district shall have been previously
ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and
cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses
in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for
his defense.
The
founders of our country knew that if government passed bad
laws, the people, themselves, must have the right to nullify
laws by acquittmg those who break them, even if they are
guilty as charged. That's why trlal by jury is so important
and that's why it appears in both the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights.
In practice,
our trials take months, if not years. Why? Because the government-sponsored
War on Drugs has overwhelmed the American justice system.
Even the judges are complaining that our courts have become
clogged with decent, law abiding citizens who had the misfortune
to be caught with unauthorized drugs. Who has benefited
from all this misery? Violent criminals and organized crime,
that's who. Real criminals have had a field day, watching
with glee as police, district attorneys and judges all grapple
with a deluge of ordinary citizens caught up in a nasty
web of surveillance, sting operations, seizures and arrests.
We are
supposed to have impartial juries, but juries are no longer
told they have the constitutional right to acquit if they
think the law itself is wrong. This is one of the greatest
weapons that our Founding Fathers used to oppose their tyrants-the
right to nullify laws through the actions of a jury.
The
founders of our country knew that if government passed bad
laws, the people, themselves, must have the right to nullify
laws by acquitting those who break them, even if they are
guilty as charged. That's why trial by jury is so important
and that's why it appears in both the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights. Our Founding Fathers understood all too
well the evils of men who violate the sanctity of our homes,
our property and our God-given, unalienable rights
The
Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to trial by jury.
If every citizen who is arrested in the War on Drugs insisted
on a jury trial, this war would come to a screeching halt.
Judges and politicians might decry this as anarchy, but
our wise old Founding Fathers would call it by another name:
Democracy.
Trial
by jury is about the only way left for the people of this
country to take back their power.
ARTICLE
VII - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy
shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury
shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be
otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States,
than according to the rules of the common law.
You
have the right to a jury trial, but don't count on it. Expect
the court to use excessive bails, fines and punishments
to pressure you into pleading to a lesser charge Expect
the judge to instruct the jury on how your motivation of
special circumstance is not important-even though, under
the Constitution, these facts are supposed to be judged
as well as the law itself. Judges and district attorneys
abhor jury trials and will stop at nothing to have you give
up your constitutional nghts.
If every
citizen who is arrested in the War On Drugs insisted on
a jury trial, this war would come to a screeching halt.
Judges and politicians might decry this as anarchy, but
our wise old Founding Fathers would call it by another name:
Democracy.
The
Eighth Amendment specifically prohibits excessive bail,
fines and punishrnent:
ARTICLE
VIII - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive
fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The
Founding Fathers would be shocked at the excessive bails,
fines and punishments inflicted for the violation of our
drug laws. Jailing people for ten years for a joint or seizing
their homes and property is specifically forbidden by the
eighth Amendment.
Finally,
the Ninth and Tenth Amendments give to every American all
rights beyond the Bill of Rights, including the right to
get high. Read for yourself and see how you would interpret
these last two amendments in the Bill of Rights:
ARTICLE
IX - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,
shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained
by the people.
What
this amendment says is clear-just because the Constitution
has defined certain rights, that doesn't mean rights, which
haven't been defined can be taken away.
ARTICLE
X - The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved
to the States respectively or to the people.
The
Tenth Amendment has but one aim, to keep the federal government
weak and to make the States and the People strong. The federal
government is told, in no uncertain terms, that it only
has the powers that are specifically delegated to it by
the Constitution.
The
Constitution was not written to be interpreted by judges
or law professors. Far from it, the Constitution was written
by and for "We, the People." Don't be fooled into
thinking you need an expert to tell you what your rights
are under our Constitution. Don't be fooled into believing
Congress or the President, or the Supreme Court is the final
judge of whether or not a law is unconstitutional, because
that judgment must ultimately be made by our fellow citizens
when they sit on juries. That's when "We, the People"
get to decide if a law is good or bad.
Our
Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights to spell out
what the federal government can and cannot do. We have seen
how our government is openly defying our Bill of Rights.
Now you must decide. Will you continue to support unconstitutional
laws or will you act to uphold and defend the Constitution?
Some
may argue that the federal government is already too big
and powerful and that it would be suicide to try to oppose
it. So what? Our Founding Fathers weren't afraid to take
on the British Empire. The men who founded our country showed
courage in the face of overwhelming superiority. Can we
do any less? Don't we have a duty as Americans to oppose
the kind of tyranny that our founders fought for? And don't
we also have a duty to our children to hand a free country
over to them?
Sam
Adams understood. He knew that liberty is an animated contest
between tyrants and patriots,. Will you fight for liberty
or will you "crouch down and lick the hands that feed
you?" The choice is yours